International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume B
Reciprocal space
Edited by U. Shmueli

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. B. ch. 1.3, pp. 67-68   | 1 | 2 |

Section 1.3.4.2.2.4. Crystallographic group action in real space

G. Bricognea

a MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, England, and LURE, Bâtiment 209D, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France

1.3.4.2.2.4. Crystallographic group action in real space

| top | pdf |

The action of a crystallographic group Γ may be written in terms of standard coordinates in [{\bb R}^{3}/{\bb Z}^{3}] as [(g, {\bf x}) \;\longmapsto\; S_{g} ({\bf x}) = {\bf R}_{g} {\bf x} + {\bf t}_{g} \hbox{ mod } \Lambda, \quad g \in G,] with [S_{g_{1} g_{2}} = S_{g_{1}} S_{g_{2}}.]

An important characteristic of the representation [\theta : g \;\longmapsto\; S_{g}] is its reducibility, i.e. whether or not it has invariant subspaces other than [\{{\bf 0}\}] and the whole of [{\bb R}^{3}/{\bb Z}^{3}]. For triclinic, monoclinic and orthorhombic space groups, θ is reducible to a direct sum of three one-dimensional representations: [{\bf R}_{g} = \pmatrix{{\bf R}_{g}^{(1)} &{\bf 0} &{\bf 0}\cr {\bf 0} &{\bf R}_{g}^{(2)} &{\bf 0}\cr {\bf 0} &{\bf 0} &{\bf R}_{g}^{(3)}\cr}\hbox{;}] for trigonal, tetragonal and hexagonal groups, it is reducible to a direct sum of two representations, of dimension 2 and 1, respectively; while for tetrahedral and cubic groups, it is irreducible.

By Schur's lemma (see e.g. Ledermann, 1987[link]), any matrix which commutes with all the matrices [{\bf R}_{g}] for [g \in G] must be a scalar multiple of the identity in each invariant subspace.

In the reducible cases, the reductions involve changes of basis which will be rational, not integral, for those arithmetic classes corresponding to non-primitive lattices. Thus the simplification of having maximally reduced representation has as its counterpart the use of non-primitive lattices.

The notions of orbit, isotropy subgroup and fundamental domain (or asymmetric unit) for the action of G on [{\bb R}^{3}/{\bb Z}^{3}] are inherited directly from the general setting of Section 1.3.4.2.2.2.[link] Points x for which [G_{{\bf x}} \neq \{e\}] are called special positions, and the various types of isotropy subgroups which may be encountered in crystallographic groups have been labelled by means of Wyckoff symbols. The representation operators [S_{g}^{\#}] in [L({\bb R}^{3}/{\bb Z}^{3})] have the form: [[S_{g}^{\#} f] ({\bf x}) = f[S_{g}^{-1} ({\bf x})] = f[{\bf R}_{g}^{-1} ({\bf x} - {\bf t}_{g})].] The operators [R_{g}^{\#}] associated to the purely rotational part of each transformation [S_{g}] will also be used. Note the relation: [S_{g}^{\#} = \tau_{{\bf t}_{g}} R_{g}^{\#}.]

Let a crystal structure be described by the list of the atoms in its unit cell, indexed by [k \in K]. Let the electron-density distribution about the centre of mass of atom k be described by [\rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k}] with respect to the standard coordinates x. Then the motif [\rho\llap{$-\!$}^{0}] may be written as a sum of translates: [\rho\llap{$-\!$}^{0} = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{k \in K}} \tau_{{\bf x}_{k}}\rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k}] and the crystal electron density is [\rho\llap{$-\!$} = r^{*} \rho\llap{$-\!$}^{0}].

Suppose that [\rho\llap{$-\!$}] is invariant under Γ. If [{\bf x}_{k_{1}}] and [{\bf x}_{k_{2}}] are in the same orbit, say [{\bf x}_{k_{2}} = S_{g}({\bf x}_{k_{1}})], then [\tau_{{\bf x}_{k_{2}}} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k_{2}} = S_{g}^{\#} (\tau_{{\bf x}_{k_{1}}} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k_{1}}).] Therefore if [{\bf x}_{k}] is a special position and thus [G_{{\bf x}_{k}} \neq \{e\}], then [S_{g}^{\#} (\tau_{{\bf x}_{k}} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k}) = \tau_{{\bf x}_{k}} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k} \quad \hbox{for all } g \in G_{{\bf x}_{k}}.] This identity implies that [{\bf R}_{g}{\bf x}_{k} + {\bf t}_{g} \equiv {\bf x}_{k} \hbox{ mod } \Lambda] (the special position condition), and that [\rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k} = R_{g}^{\#} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k},] i.e. that [\rho\llap{$-\!$}_{k}] must be invariant by the pure rotational part of [G_{{\bf x}_{k}}]. Trueblood (1956)[link] investigated the consequences of this invariance on the thermal vibration tensor of an atom in a special position (see Section 1.3.4.2.2.6[link] below).

Let J be a subset of K such that [\{{\bf x}_{j}\}_{j \in J}] contains exactly one atom from each orbit. An orbit decomposition yields an expression for [\rho\llap{$-\!$}^{0}] in terms of symmetry-unique atoms: [\rho\llap{$-\!$}^{0} = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{j \in J}} \left({\textstyle\sum\limits_{\gamma_{j} \in G/G_{{\bf x}_{j}}}} S_{\gamma_{j}}^{\#} (\tau_{{\bf x}_{j}} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{j})\right)] or equivalently [\rho\llap{$-\!$}^{0}({\bf x}) = {\textstyle\sum\limits_{j \in J}} \left\{{\textstyle\sum\limits_{\gamma_{j} \in G/G_{{\bf x}_{j}}}} \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{j}[{\bf R}_{\gamma_{j}}^{-1} ({\bf x} - {\bf t}_{\gamma_{j}}) - {\bf x}_{j}]\right\}.] If the atoms are assumed to be Gaussian, write [\eqalign{ \rho_{j}({\bf X}) &= {Z_{j} \over |\det \pi {\bf U}_{j}|^{1/2}}\cr &\quad\times \exp (- {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\bf X}^{T} {\bf U}_{j}^{-1} {\bf X}) \hbox{ in Cartesian \AA{} coordinates},}] where [Z_{j}] is the total number of electrons, and where the matrix [{\bf U}_{j}] combines the Gaussian spread of the electrons in atom j at rest with the covariance matrix of the random positional fluctuations of atom j caused by thermal agitation.

In crystallographic coordinates: [\eqalign{ \rho\llap{$-\!$}_{j} ({\bf x}) &= {Z_{j} \over |\hbox{det } \pi {\bf Q}_{j}|^{1/2}}\cr &\quad\times \exp (- {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\bf x}^{T} {\bf Q}_{j}^{-1}{\bf x}) \hbox{ with } {\bf Q}_{j} = {\bf A}^{-1} {\bf U}_{j} ({\bf A}^{-1})^{T}.}]

If atom k is in a special position [{\bf x}_{k}], then the matrix [{\bf Q}_{k}] must satisfy the identity [{\bf R}_{g} {\bf Q}_{k} {\bf R}_{g}^{-1} = {\bf Q}_{k}] for all g in the isotropy subgroup of [{\bf x}_{k}]. This condition may also be written in Cartesian coordinates as [{\bf T}_{g} {\bf U}_{k} {\bf T}_{g}^{-1} = {\bf U}_{k},] where [{\bf T}_{g} = {\bf AR}_{g} {\bf A}^{-1}.] This is a condensed form of the symmetry properties derived by Trueblood (1956)[link].

References

First citation Ledermann, W. (1987). Introduction to group characters, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
First citation Trueblood, K. N. (1956). Symmetry transformations of general anisotropic temperature factors. Acta Cryst. 9, 359–361.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page