International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume C
Mathematical, physical and chemical tables
Edited by E. Prince

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C. ch. 3.1, pp. 151-154

Section 3.1.2.2. Size, shape, and quality

P. F. Lindleya

a ESRF, Avenue des Martyrs, BP 220, F-38043 Grenoble CEDEX, France

3.1.2.2. Size, shape, and quality

| top | pdf |

A frequently occurring question involves the size and shape of single crystals required for successful diffraction studies. Among other factors, the intensity of diffraction is dependent on the volume of the crystal specimen bathed by the X-ray or neutron beam and is inversely proportional to the square of the unit-cell volume (see Chapter 6.4[link] ). Hence, small crystals with large unit cells will tend to give rise to weak diffraction patterns. This can be compensated for by increasing the incident intensity, e.g. using a synchrotron-radiation source in the case of X-rays. How large should a crystal be, and what is the smallest crystal size that can be accommodated? X-ray collimators, or slit systems, with diameters in the range 0.1 to 0.8 mm are commonly employed for single-crystal diffraction studies. For many diffractometers, the primary beam is arranged to have a plateau of uniform intensity with dimensions 0.5 × 0.5 mm. For most small inorganic and organic compounds, crystals with dimensions slightly smaller than this will suffice, depending on the strength of diffraction, although successful structure determinations have been reported on very small crystals (0.1 mm and less) with both conventional and synchrotron X-ray sources (Helliwell et al., 1993[link]). Microfocus beam lines at the third generation of synchrotron sources such as ESRF are designed to examine crystals routinely in the 10 µm range (Riekel, 1993[link]). In the case of a biological macromolecule of molecular weight 50 kDa and using a conventional X-ray source (a rotating-anode generator), a crystal of 0.1 mm in all dimensions will probably give diffraction patterns from which the basic crystal system and unit-cell parameters can be deduced, but a crystal of 0.3 mm in each dimension, i.e. roughly 30 times the volume, would be required for the collection of high-resolution data (Blundell & Johnson, 1976[link]). The higher intensity and smaller beam divergence inherent in a synchrotron X-ray source mean that high-resolution data of good quality could be obtained with the smaller crystal. Indeed, useful intensity data have been obtained with crystals with a maximum dimension of 50 µm (Subsection 3.4.1.5[link] ). At cryogenic temperatures, radiation damage is greatly reduced, and increased exposure times can be utilized (at the expense of increased background) to compensate for a small crystal volume. In the case of neutrons, the sample size is generally larger than for X-rays, owing to lower neutron flux and higher beam divergence. For a steady-state high-flux reactor such as that at the Institut Laue–Langevin (France), a crystal volume of 6 mm3 or larger is recommended for biological samples. Unfortunately, crystals of this size are not readily obtainable in most cases.

The shape or habit of a single crystal is normally determined by the internal crystal structure and the growth conditions. For diffractometry purposes, it is customary to bathe the crystal in the X-ray beam, so that elongated crystals may require cutting with a razor blade in order to trim them to an appropriate size. Large crystals of hard materials can be ground into spheres or cylinders (Jeffery, 1977[link]), so that corrections can be readily made to the observed intensities for systematic errors in absorption (see Chapter 6.3[link] ). Crystals that have elongated prismatic or needle shapes are often useful if data are collected using oscillation geometry, since the crystal can be translated in the X-ray beam at intervals during data collection to minimize radiation damage (Subsection 3.4.1.5[link] ). In general, all shapes can be accommodated, but those that are grossly asymmetric (e.g. very thin plates) may give elongated or distorted reflections, leading to poor data quality in certain regions of the diffraction pattern.

The ultimate test of the quality of a crystal and its suitability for a structure analysis is the quality of the diffraction pattern. Ideally, the reflections should appear in the case of monochromatic radiation as single spots without satellites, tails, or streaks between the spots. The diffraction pattern should be indexable in terms of a single lattice.

References

First citation Blundell, T. L. & Johnson, L. N. (1976). Protein crystallography, Chap. 3, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
First citation Helliwell, M., Kaucic, V., Cheetham, G. M. T., Harding, M. M., Kariuki, B. M. & Rizkallah, P. J. (1993). Structure determination from small crystals of two aluminophosphates, CrAPO-14 and SAPO-43. Acta Cryst. B49, 413–420.Google Scholar
First citation Jeffery, J. W. (1977). Methods in X-ray crystallography, pp. 441–443. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
First citation Riekel, C. (1993). Beamline 1: microfocus beamline. In Annual Report of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page