International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume C
Mathematical, physical and chemical tables
Edited by E. Prince

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C. ch. 9.2, p. 754

Section 9.2.1.2.3. Structure of CdI2

D. Pandeyc and P. Krishnab

9.2.1.2.3. Structure of CdI2

| top | pdf |

The structure of cadmium iodide consists of a close packing of the I ions with the Cd ions distributed amongst half the octahedral voids. Thus, the Cd and I layers are not stacked alternately; there is one Cd layer after every two I layers as shown in Fig. 9.2.1.5[link] . The structure actually consists of molecular sheets (called minimal sandwiches) with a layer of Cd ions sandwiched between two close-packed layers of I ions. The bonding within the minimal sandwich is ionic in character and is much stronger than the bonding between successive sandwiches, which is of van der Waals type. The importance of polarization energy for the stability of such structures has recently been emphasized by Bertaut (1978[link]). It is because of the weak van der Waals bonding between the successive minimal sandwiches that the material possesses the easy cleavage characteristic of a layer structure. In describing the layer stackings in the CdI2 structure, it is customary to use Roman letters to denote the I positions and Greek letters for the Cd positions. The two most common modifications of CdI2 are 4H and 2H with layer stackings [A\gamma B\,C\alpha B \ldots] and [A\gamma B\, A\gamma B], respectively. In addition, this material also displays a number of polytype modifications of large repeat periods (Trigunayat & Verma, 1976[link]; Pandey & Krishna, 1982a[link]). From the structure of CdI2, it follows that the identity period of all such modifications must consist of an even number of I layers. The h/a ratio in all these modifications of CdI2 is 0.805, which is very different from the ideal value (Verma & Krishna, 1966[link]). The structure of PbI2, which also displays a large number of polytypes, is analogous to CdI2 with one important difference. Here, the distances between two I layers with and without an intervening Pb layer are quite different (Trigunayat & Verma, 1976[link]).

[Figure 9.2.1.5]

Figure 9.2.1.5| top | pdf |

The layer structure of CdI2: small circles represent Cd ions and larger ones I ions (after Wells, 1945[link]).

References

First citation Bertaut, E. F. (1978). The equivalent charge concept and its application to the electrostatic energy of charges and multipoles. J. Phys. (Paris), 39, 1331–1348.Google Scholar
First citation Pandey, D. & Krishna, P. (1982a). Polytypism in close-packed structures. Current topics in materials science, Vol. IX, edited by E. Kaldis, pp. 415–491. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
First citation Trigunayat, G. C. & Verma, A. R. (1976). Polytypism and stacking faults in crystals with layer structure. Crystallography and crystal chemistry of materials with layered structures, edited by F. Levy, pp. 269–340. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
First citation Verma, A. R. & Krishna, P. (1966). Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals, New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
First citation Wells, A. F. (1945). Structural inorganic chemistry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page