International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume D
Physical properties of crystals
Edited by A. Authier

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. D. ch. 1.3, p. 88

Section 1.3.4.6.1. Introduction

A. Authiera* and A. Zarembowitchb

a Institut de Minéralogie et de la Physique des Milieux Condensés, Bâtiment 7, 140 rue de Lourmel, 75015 Paris, France, and bLaboratoire de Physique des Milieux Condensés, Université P. et M. Curie, 75252 Paris CEDEX 05, France
Correspondence e-mail:  aauthier@wanadoo.fr

1.3.4.6.1. Introduction

| top | pdf |

As mentioned in Section 1.3.4.1[link], the elastic constants of a material can be obtained by the elastic response of the material to particular static forces; however, such measurements are not precise and the most often used approach nowadays consists of determining the velocity of ultrasonic waves propagating along different directions of the crystal and calculating the elastic constants from the Christoffel determinants (1.3.4.8)[link]. The experimental values are often accurate enough to justify the distinction between static and dynamic values of the elastic constants and between phase and group velocities, and the careful consideration of the frequency range of the experiments.

  • (i) Static and dynamic elastic constants. When one measures the elastic response of a material to external static forces, work is done and heat is produced. In general, the external forces are applied slowly (quasi-elastic processes) and the solid body remains in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, which can be considered as a heat reservoir. In this case, the measured elastic constants are isothermal elastic constants as defined in Section 1.1.5.1[link] . On the contrary, when ultrasonic waves propagate in a solid body, the compressed regions are slightly hotter than the expanded regions; the associated temperature gradients give rise to irreversible processes of thermal conduction. However, in the megahertz or higher-frequency ranges, the processes of heat exchange between different regions or between the solid and its surroundings are slow compared with the period of the ultrasonic wave and hence can be considered as isentropic. In this case, the measured velocities are isentropic and the elastic stiffnesses deduced from them are the adiabatic elastic stiffnesses as defined in Section 1.1.5.4[link] . The differences between isothermal and adiabatic elastic stiffnesses can be calculated from equation (1.1.5.2)[link] : [\eqalign{\delta T_{ij} &= (c_{ijkl})^{\Theta} \delta S_{kl} - \lambda_{ij}\delta \Theta\cr \delta \sigma &= \lambda_{kl} \delta S_{kl} + {\rho C^{S} \over \Theta} \delta \Theta. \cr} ]

    By combining these two equations, it is possible to obtain relations between the isothermal elastic stiffnesses, [(c_{ijkl})^{\Theta} ], and the adiabatic elastic stiffnesses, [(c_{ijkl})^{\sigma} ]: [(c_{ijkl})^{\sigma} = (c_{ijkl})^{\Theta} + {\lambda_{ij}\lambda_{kl}\over \rho c^{S}}, ]where [c^{S}] is the specific heat at constant strain.

    This relation shows that adiabatic elastic stiffnesses are larger than isothermal elastic stiffnesses, at least for the terms of the main diagonal of the elastic matrix. In general, the differences between isothermal and adiabatic elastic stiffnesses are less than 1%. An exception to this statement concerns the temperature region near the critical temperature [T_{c}] where a phase transition occurs.

  • (ii) Frequency dependence of the elastic constants. Dynamic measurements of the elastic constants can be performed at a wide range of ultrasonic frequencies. Currently used techniques for investigating a wide range of frequencies are electronic pulse-echo techniques in the megahertz frequency range and Brillouin scattering in the 10 GHz frequency range. To evaluate the possible differences between dynamic elastic constants determined in different frequency ranges, high-accuracy measurements of the absolute value of the elastic constants are required. From optical resonance techniques in the megahertz frequency range and Brillouin scattering in the gigahertz frequency range, it has been shown that the results are the same within 0.1 to 0.2% in the case of simple and stable crystals such as sodium chloride when the ultrasonic waves can be considered as a `passive probe' (Michard et al., 1971[link]). Larger differences are observed when ultrasonic waves interact with the medium, when they favour or impede structural changes of the material or when they are absorbed for a particular frequency.

  • (iii) Phase velocity and group velocity. When the velocity of ultrasonic waves is frequency dependent (dispersive medium), one has to distinguish phase velocity and group velocity. If a resonance technique is used, the resonance frequencies correspond to phase-matching conditions and the calculation of velocity from the resonance frequencies leads to `phase velocity'. If a pulse-echo technique is used, the transit time of an elastic pulse is measured and the interpretation of the measurement is more complex. In this case, Brillouin (1932)[link] has shown that the head and the tail of the pulse travel with the group velocity. Differences of a few per cent can be observed between phase and group velocities in dispersive media.

References

First citation Brillouin, L. (1932). Propagation des ondes électromagnétiques dans les milieux matériels. Congrès International d'Électricité, Vol. 2, Section 1, pp. 739–788. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
First citation Michard, F., Zarembowitch, A., Vacher, R. & Boyer, L. (1971). Premier son et son zéro dans les nitrates de strontium, barium et plomb. Phonons, edited by M. A. Nusimovici, pp. 321–325. Paris: Flammarion. Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page