International
Tables for Crystallography Volume A Space-group symmetry Edited by Th. Hahn © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. A. ch. 12.4, pp. 833-834
https://doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000527 Chapter 12.4. Changes introduced in space-group symbols since 1935
a
Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 4a, D-91080 Uttenreuth, Germany, and bInstitut für Angewandte Physik, Lehrstuhl für Kristallographie und Strukturphysik, Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Bismarckstrasse 10, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany The original Hermann–Mauguin symbols used in the first edition of International Tables in 1935 were changed considerably in the 1952 edition. Further changes were made in the 1983 and 1995 editions. The changes made since 1935 are described in this chapter. Keywords: Hermann–Mauguin symbols; space-group symbols; international space-group symbols; glide planes; generators. |
Before the appearance of the first edition of International Tables in 1935, different notations for space groups were in use. A summary and comparative tables may be found in the introduction to that edition. The international notation was proposed by Hermann (1928a,b) and Mauguin (1931), who used the concept of lattice symmetry directions (see Chapter 12.1 ) and gave preference to reflections or glide reflections as generators. Considerable changes to the original Hermann–Mauguin short symbols were made in IT (1952).
The most important change refers to the symmetry directions. In the original Hermann–Mauguin symbols [(IT, 1935)], the distribution of symmetry elements is prescribed by the point-group symbol in the traditional setting, for example (not ) but (not ). This procedure sometimes implies the use of a larger unit cell than would be necessary. In IT (1952) and in the present Tables, however, the lattice symmetry directions always refer to the conventional cell (cf. Part 9 ) of the Bravais lattice. The results of this change are (a) different symbols for centring types and (b) different sequences of the symbols referring to the point group. These differences occur only in some space groups that have a tetragonal or hexagonal lattice.
Thus, the two different space groups and were symbolized by and in IT (1935) because in both cases the twofold axis had to be connected with the secondary set of symmetry directions. The new international symbols are and ; since in the point group of the Bravais lattice the secondary and tertiary set cannot be distinguished, the twofold axis in the subgroups and may occur in either the secondary or the tertiary set. Accordingly, the C-centred cell of , used in IT (1935), was transformed to a primitive one with the twofold axis along the tertiary set, resulting in the symbol .
The same considerations hold for and and for space groups with a hexagonal lattice belonging to the point groups 32, 3m and , which can be oriented in two ways with respect to the lattice.
For example, the point group 3m has two sets of symmetry directions. If the basis vector a is normal to the mirror plane m, two hexagonal cells with different centrings are possible:
The latter can be transformed to a primitive cell in which the mirror plane is normal to the representative of the tertiary set of the hexagonal lattice. In IT (1952) and the present editions, the primitive hexagonal cell is described by P. Thus, the above space groups receive the symbols and .
Further changes are:
The new symbol is indicated in the headline of these space groups. Further details are given in Chapter 1.3 .
Difficulties arising from these changes are avoided by selecting the lexicographically first one of the two possible glide parts for the generating operation.
The 1935 symbols and all the changes adopted in the present edition of International Tables can be seen in Table 12.3.4.1 . Differences in the symbols between IT (1952) and the present edition may be found in the last column of this table; cf. also Section 2.2.4 .
References
Hermann, C. (1928a). Zur systematischen Strukturtheorie I. Eine neue Raumgruppensymbolik. Z. Kristallogr. 68, 257–287.Google ScholarHermann, C. (1928b). Zur systematischen Strukturtheorie II. Ableitung der Raumgruppen aus ihren Kennvektoren. Z. Kristallogr. 69, 226–249.Google Scholar
Internationale Tabellen zur Bestimmung von Kristallstrukturen (1935). I. Band, edited by C. Hermann. Berlin: Borntraeger. [Reprint with corrections: Ann Arbor: Edwards (1944). Abbreviated as IT (1935).]Google Scholar
International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (1952). Vol. 1, edited by N. F. M. Henry & K. Lonsdale. Birmingham: Kynoch Press. [Revised editions: 1965, 1969 and 1977. Abbreviated as IT (1952).]Google Scholar
Mauguin, Ch. (1931). Sur le symbolisme des groupes de répetition ou de symétrie des assemblages cristallins. Z. Kristallogr. 76, 542–558.Google Scholar
Wolff, P. M. de, Billiet, Y., Donnay, J. D. H., Fischer, W., Galiulin, R. B., Glazer, A. M., Hahn, Th., Senechal, M., Shoemaker, D. P., Wondratschek, H., Wilson, A. J. C. & Abrahams, S. C. (1992). Symbols for symmetry elements and symmetry operations. Final Report of the International Union of Crystallography Ad-hoc Committee on the Nomenclature of Symmetry. Acta Cryst. A48, 727–732.Google Scholar