Tables for
Volume B
Reciprocal space
Edited by U. Shmueli

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. B. ch. 2.5, p. 287   | 1 | 2 |

Section Reciprocity and Friedel's law

P. Goodmanb Reciprocity and Friedel's law

| top | pdf |

Reciprocity was introduced into the subject of electron diffraction in stages, the essential theoretical basis, through Schrödinger's equation, being given by Bilhorn et al. (1964)[link], and the N-beam diffraction applications being derived successively by von Laue (1935)[link], Cowley (1969)[link], Pogany & Turner (1968)[link], Moodie (1972)[link], Buxton et al. (1976)[link], and Gunning & Goodman (1992)[link].

Reciprocity represents a reverse-incidence configuration reached with the reversed wavevectors [\bar{{\bf k}}_{0} = - {\bf k}_{g}] and [\bar{{\bf k}}_{g} = - {\bf k}_{0}], so that the scattering vector [\Delta{\bf k} = {\bf k}_{g} - {\bf k}_{0} = \bar{{\bf k}}_{0} - \bar{{\bf k}}_{g}] is unchanged, but [\bar{{\bf K}}_{0g} = {1 \over 2} (\bar{{\bf k}}_{0} + \bar{{\bf k}}_{g})] is changed in sign and hence reversed (Moodie, 1972[link]). The reciprocity equation, [{\bf u}_{g, \, {\bf K}} = {\bf u}_{g, \, \bar{{\bf K}}}^{*}, \eqno(] is valid independently of crystal symmetry, but cannot contribute symmetry to the pattern unless a crystal-inverting symmetry element is present (since [\bar{{\bf K}}] belongs to a reversed wavevector). The simplest case is centrosymmetry, which permits the right-hand side of ([link] to be complex-conjugated giving the useful CBED pattern equation [{\bf u}_{g, \, {\bf K}} = {\bf u}_{\bar{g}, \, {\bf K}}. \eqno(] Since K is common to both sides there is a point-by-point identity between the related distributions, separated by 2g (the distance between g and [\bar{g}] reflections). This invites an obvious analogy with Friedel's law, [F_{g} = F_{\bar{g}}^{*}], with the reservation that ([link] holds only for centrosymmetric crystals. This condition ([link] constitutes what has become known as the ±H symmetry and, incidentally, is the only reciprocity-induced symmetry so general as to not depend upon a disc symmetry-point or line, nor on a particular zone axis (i.e. it is not a point symmetry but a translational symmetry of the pattern intensity).


First citation Bilhorn, D. E., Foldy, L. L., Thaler, R. M. & Tobacman, W. (1964). Remarks concerning reciprocity in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 5, 435–441.Google Scholar
First citation Buxton, B., Eades, J. A., Steeds, J. W. & Rackham, G. M. (1976). The symmetry of electron diffraction zone axis patterns. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 181, 171–193.Google Scholar
First citation Cowley, J. M. (1969). Image contrast in transmission scanning electron microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 15, 58–59.Google Scholar
First citation Gunning, J. & Goodman, P. (1992). Reciprocity in electron diffraction. Acta Cryst. A48, 591–595.Google Scholar
First citation Laue, M. von (1935). Die Fluoreszenzrontgenstrahlung von Einkristallen. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 23, 703–726.Google Scholar
First citation Moodie, A. F. (1972). Reciprocity and shape function in multiple scattering diagrams. Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 27, 437–440.Google Scholar
First citation Pogany, A. P. & Turner, P. S. (1968). Reciprocity in electron diffraction and microscopy. Acta Cryst. A24, 103–109.Google Scholar

to end of page
to top of page