International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume C
Mathematical, physical and chemical tables
Edited by E. Prince

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C. ch. 2.3, p. 63

Section 2.3.3.4. Rate-meter/strip-chart recording

W. Parrisha and J. I. Langfordb

a IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA, USA, and bSchool of Physics & Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, England

2.3.3.4. Rate-meter/strip-chart recording

| top | pdf |

Formerly, the most common method of obtaining diffractometer data was by using a rate-meter and strip-chart recorder with the paper moving synchronously with the constant angular velocity of the scan. This simple analogue method is still used and a large fraction of the JCPDS (ICDD) file prior to about 1982 was obtained in this way.

The method has several limitations: the data are not in the digital form required for computers, and are distorted; manual measurement of the chart takes a long time and has low accuracy. The output of the strip chart lags behind the input by an amount determined by the product of the scanning speed and the time constant of the rate-meter, including the speed of the recorder pen. The peak height is decreased and shifted in the direction of the scan causing asymmetric broadening with loss of resolution. The profile shape, Kα-doublet separation, and scan direction also contribute to distortion. When the product of the scan speed and time constant have the same value, the profile shapes are the same even though the total count is determined by the scan speed, Figs. 2.3.3.4 (a) and (b)[link]. If the product is large, the distortion is severe (c), and very weak peaks may be lost.

[Figure 2.3.3.4]

Figure 2.3.3.4| top | pdf |

Rate-meter strip-chart recordings. REV: scan direction reversed. Scan speed and time constant shown at top.








































to end of page
to top of page