International
Tables for Crystallography Volume C Mathematical, physical and chemical tables Edited by E. Prince © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C. ch. 4.2, pp. 214-215
Section 4.2.3.2.1. Experimental configurations
D. C. Creaghb
|
Experimental configurations that set out to determine the X-ray linear attenuation coefficient or the corresponding mass absorption coefficients (μ/ρ) must have characteristics that reflect the underlying assumptions from which equation (4.2.3.1)
was derived, namely:
|
Because of the considerable discrepancies that often exist in X-ray attenuation measurements (see, for example, IT IV, 1974), the IUCr Commission on Crystallographic Apparatus set up a project to determine which, if any, of the many techniques for the measurement of X-ray attenuation coefficients is most likely to yield correct results. In the project, a number of different experimental configurations were used. These are shown in Fig. 4.2.3.3
. The configurations used ranged in complexity from that of Fig. 4.2.3.3(a)
, which uses a slit-collimated beam from a sealed tube and a β-filter to select its characteristic radiation, and a proportional counter and associated electronics to detect the transmitted-beam intensity, to that of Fig. 4.2.3.3
(f), which uses a modification to a commercial X-ray-fluorescence analyser. Sources of X-rays included conventional sealed X-ray tubes, X-ray-fluorescence sources, radioisotope sources, and synchrotron-radiation sources. Detectors ranged from simple ionization chambers, which have no capacity for photon energy detection, to solid-state detectors, which provide a relatively high degree of energy discrimination. In a number of cases (Figs. 4.2.3.3c, d, e, and f
), monochromatization of the beam was effected using single Bragg reflection from silicon single crystals. In Fig. 4.2.3.3(i)
, the incident-beam monochromator is using reflections from two Bragg reflectors tuned so as to eliminate harmonic radiation from the source.
The performance of these systems was evaluated for a range of materials that included:
The results of this study are outlined in Section 4.2.3.2.3.
References


