International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume D
Physical properties of crystals
Edited by A. Authier

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. D. ch. 3.3, pp. 440-441

Section 3.3.10.7.3. Fitting problems of ferroelastic twins

Th. Hahna* and H. Klapperb

a Institut für Kristallographie, Rheinisch–Westfälische Technische Hochschule, D-52056 Aachen, Germany, and bMineralogisch-Petrologisches Institut, Universität Bonn, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
Correspondence e-mail:  hahn@xtal.rwth-aachen.de

3.3.10.7.3. Fitting problems of ferroelastic twins

| top | pdf |

The real problem of space-constrained twin textures, however, is provided by non-merohedral (ferroelastic) transformation and deformation twins (including the cubic deformation twins of the spinel law). This is schematically illustrated in Fig. 3.3.10.12[link] for the very common case of orthorhombic[\longrightarrow]monoclinic transformation twins ([\beta = 90^\circ + \varepsilon)].

[Figure 3.3.10.12]

Figure 3.3.10.12 | top | pdf |

Illustration of space-filling problems of domains for a (ferroelastic) orthorhombic [\rightarrow] monoclinic phase transition with an angle [\varepsilon] (exaggerated) of spontaneous shear. (a) Orthorhombic parent crystal with symmetry [2/m\,2/m\,2/m]. (b) Domain pairs [1+2], [1+3] and [2+4] of the monoclinic daughter phase ([\beta = 90^\circ + \varepsilon]) with independent twin reflection planes (100) and (001). (c) The combination of domain pairs [1+2] and [1+3] leads to a gap with angle [90^\circ - 3\varepsilon], whereas the combination of the three domain pairs [1+2], [1+3] and [2+4] generates a wedge-shaped overlap (hatched) of domains 3 and 4 with angle [4\varepsilon]. (d) Twin lamellae systems of domain pairs [1+2] (left) and [1+3] (or [2+4]) (right) with low-energy contact planes (100) and (001). Depending on the value of [\varepsilon], adaptation problems with more or less strong lattice distortions arise in the boundary region A–A between the two lamellae systems. (e) Stress relaxation and reduction of strain energy in the region A–A by the tapering of domains 2 (`needle domains') on approaching the (nearly perpendicular) boundary of domains [3+1]. The tips of the needle lamellae may impinge on the boundary or may be somewhat withdrawn from it, as indicated in the figure. The angle between the two lamellae systems is [90^\circ - \varepsilon].

Figs. 3.3.10.12[link](a) and (b) show the `splitting' of two mirror planes (100) and (001) of parent symmetry mmm, as a result of a phase transition [mmmF12/m1], into the two independent and symmetrically non-equivalent twin reflection planes (100) and (001), each one representing a different (monoclinic) twin law. The two orientation states of each domain pair differ by the splitting angle [2\varepsilon]. Note that in transformation twins the angle [\varepsilon] (spontaneous shear strain) is small, at most one or two degrees, due to the pseudosymmetry [\cal H] of the daughter phase with respect to the parent symmetry [\cal G]. It can be large, however, for deformation twins, e.g. calcite. The resulting fitting problems in ferroelastic textures are illustrated in Fig. 3.3.10.12[link](c). Owing to the splitting angle [2\varepsilon], twin domains would form gaps or overlaps, compared to a texture with [\varepsilon = 0], where all domains fit precisely. In reality, the misfit due to [\varepsilon \ne 0] leads to local stresses and associated elastic strains around the meeting points of three domains related by two twin laws [triple junctions, cf. Palmer et al. (1988[link]), Figs. 3–6)].

For the orthorhombic[\longrightarrow]monoclinic transition considered here, the two different twin laws often lead to two and (for small [\varepsilon]) nearly perpendicular sets of polysynthetic twin lamellae. This is illustrated in Fig. 3.3.10.12[link](d). The boundaries in one set are formed by (100) planes, those in the other set by (001) planes, both of low energy. The misfit problems are located exclusively in the region AA where the two systems of lamellae meet. Here wedge-like domains (the so-called `needle domains', see below) are formed, as shown in Fig. 3.3.10.12[link](e), i.e. the twin lamellae of one system taper on approaching the perpendicular twin system (right-angled twins), forming rounded or sharp needle tips. The tips of the needle lamellae may be in contact with the perpendicular lamella or may be somewhat withdrawn from it. These effects are the consequence of strain-energy minimization in the transition region of domain systems, as compared to the large-area contacts between parallel twin lamellae.

The formation of two lamellae systems with wedge-like domains was demonstrated very early on by the polarization-optical study of the orthorhombic[\longrightarrow]monoclinic (222[\longrightarrow]2) transformation of Rochelle salt at 297 K by Chernysheva (1950[link], 1955[link]; quoted after Klassen-Neklyudova, 1964[link], pp. 27–30 and 76–77, Figs. 35, 38 and 100; see also Zheludev, 1971[link], pp. 180–185). The term `needle domains' was coined by Salje et al. (1985[link]) in their study of the monoclinic[\longrightarrow]triclinic [(2/m\longrightarrow{\bar 1}]) transition of Na-feldspar. Another detailed description of needle domains is provided by Palmer et al. (1988[link]) for the cubic[\longrightarrow]tetragonal ([4/m\,{\bar 3}\,2/m \longrightarrow 4/m\,2/m\,2/m]) transformation of leucite at 878 K. The typical domain structure resulting from this transition is shown in Fig. 3.3.10.13[link].

[Figure 3.3.10.13]

Figure 3.3.10.13 | top | pdf |

Thin section of tetragonal leucite, K(AlSi2O6), between crossed polarizers. The two nearly perpendicular systems of (101) twin lamellae result from the cubic-to-tetragonal phase transition at about 878 K. Width of twin lamellae 20–40 µm. Courtesy of M. Raith, Bonn.

A similar example is provided by the extensively investigated tetragonal[\longrightarrow]orthorhombic transformation twinning of the high-Tc superconductor YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBaCu) below about 973 K (Roth et al., 1987[link]; Schmid et al., 1988[link]; Keester et al., 1988[link], especially Fig. 6). Here two symmetrically equivalent systems of lamellae with twin laws [m(110)] and [m({\bar 1}10)] meet at nearly right angles ([\varepsilon \approx 1^\circ]). Interesting TEM observations of tapering, impinging and intersecting twin lamellae are presented by Müller et al. (1989[link]). An extensive review on twinning of YBaCu, with emphasis on X-ray diffraction studies (including diffuse scattering), was published by Shektman (1993[link]).

A particularly remarkable case occurs for hexagonal[\longrightarrow]orthorhombic ferroelastic transformation twins. Well known examples are the pseudo-hexagonal K2SO4-type crystals (cf. Example 3.3.6.7[link]). Three (cyclic) sets of orthorhombic twin lamellae with interfaces parallel to [\{10{\bar 1}0\}_{\rm hex}] or [\{110\}_{\rm orth}] are generated by the transformation. More detailed observations on hexagonal–orthorhombic twins are available for the III[\longrightarrow]II (heating) and I[\longrightarrow]II (cooling) transformations of KLiSO4 at about 712 and 938 K (Jennissen, 1990[link]; Scherf et al., 1997[link]). The development of the three systems of twin lamellae of the orthorhombic phase II is shown by two polarization micrographs in Fig. 3.3.10.14[link]. A further example, the cubic[\longrightarrow]rhombohedral phase transition of the perovskite LaAlO3, was studied by Bueble et al. (1998[link]).

[Figure 3.3.10.14]

Figure 3.3.10.14 | top | pdf |

Twin textures generated by the two different hexagonal-to-orthorhombic phase transitions of KLiSO4. The figures show parts of [(0001)_{\rm hex}] plates (viewed along [001]) between crossed polarizers. (a) Phase boundary III[\longrightarrow]II with circular 712 K transition isotherm during heating. Transition from the inner (cooler) room-temperature phase III (hexagonal, dark) to the (warmer) high-temperature phase II (orthorhombic, birefringent). Owing to the loss of the threefold axis, lamellar [\{10{\bar 1}0\}_{\rm hex} = \{110\}_{\rm orth}] cyclic twin domains of three orientation states appear. (b) Sketch of the orientations states 1, 2, 3 and the optical extinction directions of the twin lamellae. Note the tendency of the lamellae to orient their interfaces normal to the circular phase boundary. Arrows indicate the direction of motion of the transition isotherm during heating. (c) Phase boundary I[\longrightarrow]II with 938 K transition isotherm during cooling. The dark upper region is still in the hexagonal phase I, the lower region has already transformed into the orthorhombic phase II (below 938 K). Note the much finer and more irregular domain structure compared with the III[\longrightarrow]II transition in (a). Courtesy of Ch. Scherf, PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen, 1999; cf. Scherf et al. (1997)[link].

Another surprising feature is the penetration of two or more differently oriented nano-sized twin lamellae, which is often encountered in electron micrographs (cf. Müller et al., 1989[link], Fig. 2b). In several cases, the penetration region is interpreted as a metastable area of the higher-symmetrical para-elastic parent phase.

In addition to the fitting problems discussed above, the resulting final twin texture is determined by several further effects, such as:

  • (a) the nucleation of the (twinned) daughter phase in one or several places in the crystal;

  • (b) the propagation of the phase boundary (transformation front, cf. Fig. 3.3.10.14[link]);

  • (c) the tendency of the twinned crystal to minimize the overall elastic strain energy induced by the fitting problems of different twin lamellae systems.

Systematic treatments of ferroelastic twin textures were first published by Boulesteix (1984[link], especially Section 3.3 and references cited therein) and by Shuvalov et al. (1985[link]). This topic is extensively treated in Section 3.4.4[link] of the present volume. A detailed theoretical explanation and computational simulation of these twin textures, with numerous examples, was recently presented by Salje & Ishibashi (1996[link]) and Salje et al. (1998[link]). Textbook versions of these problems are available by Zheludev (1971[link]) and Putnis (1992[link]).

References

First citation Boulesteix, C. (1984). A survey of domains and domain walls generated by crystallographic phase transitions causing a change of the lattice. Phys. Status Solidi A, 86, 11–42.Google Scholar
First citation Bueble, S., Knorr, K., Brecht, E. & Schmahl, W. W. (1998). Influence of the ferroelastic twin domain structure on the 100 surface morphology of LaAlO3 HTSC substrates. Surface Sci. 400, 345–355.Google Scholar
First citation Chernysheva, M. A. (1950). Mechanical twinning in crystals of Rochelle salt. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 74, 247–249. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
First citation Chernysheva, M. A. (1955). Twinning phenomena in crystals of Rochelle salt. PhD thesis, Moscow. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
First citation Jennissen, H.-D. (1990). Phasenumwandlungen und Defektstrukturen in Kristallen mit tetraedrischen Baugruppen. PhD thesis, Institut für Kristallographie, RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
First citation Keester, K. L., Housley, R. M. & Marshall, D. B. (1988). Growth and characterization of large YBa2Cu3O7−x single crystals. J. Cryst. Growth, 91, 295–301.Google Scholar
First citation Klassen-Neklyudova, M. V. (1964). Mechanical twinning of crystals. New York: Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
First citation Müller, W. F., Wolf, Th. & Flükiger, R. (1989). Microstructure of superconducting ceramics of YBa2Cu3O7−x. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 161, 41–67.Google Scholar
First citation Palmer, D. C., Putnis, A. & Salje, E. K. H. (1988). Twinning in tetragonal leucite. Phys. Chem. Mineral. 16, 298–303.Google Scholar
First citation Putnis, A. (1992). Introduction to mineral sciences, especially chs. 7.3 and 12.4. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
First citation Roth, G., Ewert, D., Heger, G., Hervieu, M., Michel, C., Raveau, B., D'Yvoire, F. & Revcolevschi, A. (1987). Phase transformation and microtwinning in crystals of the high-TC superconductor YBa2Cu3O8−x, [x \approx {\it 1.0}]. Z. Physik B, 69, 21–27.Google Scholar
First citation Salje, E. K. H., Buckley, A., Van Tendeloo, G., Ishibashi, Y. & Nord, G. L. (1998). Needle twins and right-angled twins in minerals: comparison between experiment and theory. Am. Mineral. 83, 811–822.Google Scholar
First citation Salje, E. K. H. & Ishibashi, Y. (1996). Mesoscopic structures in ferroelastic crystals: needle twins and right-angled domains. J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 8, 1–19.Google Scholar
First citation Salje, E. K. H., Kuscholke, B. & Wruck, B. (1985). Domain wall formation in minerals: I. Theory of twin boundary shapes in Na-feldspar. Phys. Chem. Miner. 12, 132–140.Google Scholar
First citation Scherf, Ch., Hahn, Th., Heger, G., Becker, R. A., Wunderlich, W. & Klapper, H. (1997). Optical and synchrotron radiation white-beam topographic investigation during the high-temperature phase transition of KLiSO4. Ferroelectrics, 191, 171–177.Google Scholar
First citation Schmid, H., Burkhardt, E., Walker, E., Brixel, W., Clin, M., Rivera, J.-P., Jorda, J.-L., François, M. & Yvon, K. (1988). Polarized light and X-ray precession study of the ferroelastic domains of YBa2Cu3O7−d. Z. Phys. B, 72, 305–322.Google Scholar
First citation Shektman, V. Sh. (1993). Editor. The real structure of high-Tc superconductors, especially ch. 3, Twins and structure of twin boundaries, by I. M. Shmyt'ko & V. Sh. Shektman. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
First citation Shuvalov, L. A., Dudnik, E. F. & Wagin, S. V. (1985). Domain structure geometry of real ferroelastics. Ferroelectrics, 65, 143–152.Google Scholar
First citation Zheludev, I. S. (1971). Physics of crystalline dielectrics, Vol. 1. Crystallography and spontaneous polarization. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page