|
International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 19.5, p. 447
Section 19.5.6.5. Integration of continuous data
aWhistler Center for Carbohydrate Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA, and bDepartment of Molecular Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA |
In diffraction from noncrystalline fibres, intensity is a function of R on each layer line. Angular deconvolution (Makowski, 1978![[link]](/graphics/greenarr.gif)
; Namba & Stubbs, 1985; Yamashita et al., 1995) or profile fitting (Millane & Arnott, 1986) corrects for disorientation and overlap between adjacent layer lines and may also incorporate background subtraction. The intensity determined in this way should be corrected for geometric and other effects if this has not been done previously (Section 19.5.6.2; Namba & Stubbs, 1985; Millane & Arnott, 1986).
References
Makowski, L. (1978). Processing of X-ray diffraction data from partially oriented specimens. J. Appl. Cryst. 11, 273–283.Google Scholar
Millane, R. P. & Arnott, S. (1986). Digital processing of X-ray diffraction patterns from oriented fibers. J. Macromol. Sci. Phys. B24, 193–227.Google Scholar
Namba, K. & Stubbs, G. (1985). Solving the phase problem in fiber diffraction. Application to tobacco mosaic virus at 3.6 Å resolution. Acta Cryst. A41, 252–262.Google Scholar
Yamashita, I., Vonderviszt, F., Mimori, Y., Suzuki, H., Oosawa, K. & Namba, K. (1995). Radial mass analysis of the flagellar filament of Salmonella: implications for the subunit folding. J. Mol. Biol. 253, 547–558.Google Scholar
