International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume F
Crystallography of biological macromolecules
Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 19.6, p. 458   | 1 | 2 |

Figure 19.6.4.4 

T. S. Bakera* and R. Hendersonb

a Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1392, USA, and bMedical Research Council, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, England
Correspondence e-mail:  tsb@bragg.bio.purdue.edu

[Figure 19.6.4.4]
Figure 19.6.4.4

Representative plots of the microscope contrast-transfer function (CTF) as a function of spatial frequency, for two different defocus settings (0.7 and 4.0 µm underfocus) and for a field-emission (light curve) or tungsten (dark curve) electron source. All plots correspond to electron images formed in an electron microscope operated at 200 kV with objective-lens aberration coefficients [C_{s} = C_{c} = 2.0] mm and assuming amplitude contrast of 4.8% (Toyoshima et al., 1993[link]). The spatial coherence, which is related to the electron source size and expressed as β, the half-angle of illumination, for tungsten and FEG electron sources was fixed at 0.3 and 0.015 mrad, respectively. Likewise, the temporal coherence (expressed as ΔE, the energy spread) was fixed at 1.6 and 0.5 eV for tungsten and FEG sources. The combined effects of the poorer spatial and temporal coherence of the tungsten source leads to a significant dampening, and hence loss of contrast, of the CTF at progressively higher resolutions compared to that observed in FEG-equipped microscopes. The greater number of contrast reversals with higher defocus arises because of the greater out-of-focus phase shifts as described in Section 19.6.4.4[link].