InternationalCrystallography of biological macromoleculesTables for Crystallography Volume F Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 21.1, pp. 501-502
## Section 21.1.7.2.1. Geometry and stereochemistry |

The covalent geometry of a model can be assessed by comparing bond lengths and angles to a library of `ideal' values. In the past, every refinement and modelling program had its own set of `ideal' values. This even made it possible to detect (with 95% accuracy) with which program a model had been refined, simply by inspecting its covalent geometry (Laskowski, Moss & Thornton, 1993). Nowadays, standard sets of ideal bond lengths and bond angles derived from an analysis of small-molecule crystal structures from the CSD (Allen *et al.*, 1979) are available for proteins (Engh & Huber, 1991; Priestle, 1994) and nucleic acids (Parkinson *et al.*, 1996). For other entities, typical bond lengths and bond angles can be taken from tables of standard values (Allen *et al.*, 1987) or derived by other means (Kleywegt & Jones, 1998; Greaves *et al.*, 1999).

For bond lengths, the r.m.s. deviation from ideal values is invariably quoted. Deviations from ideality of bond angles can be expressed directly as an angular r.m.s. deviation or in terms of angle distances (*i.e.* the angle ∠*ABC* is measured by the 1–3 distance |*AC*|; note that this distance is also implicitly dependent on the bond lengths |*AB*| and |*BC*|). There are some indications that protein geometry cannot always be captured by assuming unimodal distributions (*i.e.* geometric features with only a single `ideal' value). For example, Karplus (1996) found that the main-chain bond angle τ_{3} (∠N—C^{α}—C) varies as a function of the main-chain torsion angles ϕ and ψ.

Chirality is another important criterion in the case of biomacromolecules: most amino-acid residues will have the L configuration for their C^{α} atom. Also, the C^{β} atoms of threonine and isoleucine residues are chiral centres (IUPAC–IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature, 1970; Morris *et al.*, 1992). Chirality can be assessed in terms of improper torsion angles or chiral volumes. For example, to check if the C^{α} atom of any residue other than glycine has the L configuration, the improper (or virtual) torsion angle C^{α}—N—C—C^{β} should have a value of about +34° (a value near −34° would indicate a D-amino acid). The torsion angle is called improper or virtual because it measures a torsion around something other than a covalent bond, in this case the N—C `virtual bond'. The chiral volume is defined as the triple scalar product of the vectors from a central atom to three attached atoms (Hendrickson, 1985). For instance, the chiral volume of a C^{α} atom is defined as where **r**_{X} is the position vector of atom *X*. It should be noted that the chiral volume also implicitly depends on the bond lengths and angles involving the four atoms.

Another issue to consider is that of moieties that are necessarily planar (*e.g.* carboxylate groups, phenyl rings; Hooft *et al.*, 1996*a*). Again, planarity can be assessed in two different ways: by inspecting a set of (possibly improper) torsion angles and calculating their r.m.s. deviation from ideal values (*e.g.* all ring torsions in a perfectly flat phenyl ring should be 0°) or by fitting a least-squares plane through each set of atoms and calculating the r.m.s. distance of the atoms to that plane. Note that for double bonds, *cis* and *trans* configurations cannot be distinguished by deviations from a least-squares plane, but they can be distinguished by an appropriately defined torsion angle.

### References

IUPAC–IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (1970).*Abbreviations and symbols for the description of the conformation of polypeptide chains.*

*J. Mol. Biol.*

**52**, 1–17.Google Scholar

Allen, F. H., Bellard, S., Brice, M. D., Cartwright, B. A., Doubleday, A., Higgs, H., Hummelink, T., Hummelink-Peters, B. G., Kennard, O., Motherwell, W. D. S., Rodgers, J. R. & Watson, D. G. (1979).

*The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: computer-based search, retrieval, analysis and display of information.*

*Acta Cryst.*B

**35**, 2331–2339.Google Scholar

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987).

*Tables of bond lengths determined by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Part 1. Bond lengths in organic compounds.*

*J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.*2, pp. S1–S19.Google Scholar

Engh, R. A. & Huber, R. (1991).

*Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement.*

*Acta Cryst.*A

**47**, 392–400.Google Scholar

Greaves, R. B., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. (1999).

*Automated production of small-molecule dictionaries for use in crystallographic refinements.*

*Acta Cryst.*D

**55**, 1335–1339.Google Scholar

Hendrickson, W. A. (1985).

*Stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecular structures.*

*Methods Enzymol.*

**115**, 252–270.Google Scholar

Hooft, R. W. W., Sander, C. & Vriend, G. (1996

*a*).

*Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity.*

*J. Appl. Cryst.*

**29**, 714–716.Google Scholar

Karplus, P. A. (1996).

*Experimentally observed conformation-dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins.*

*Protein Sci.*

**5**, 1406–1420.Google Scholar

Kleywegt, G. J. & Jones, T. A. (1998).

*Databases in protein crystallography.*

*Acta Cryst.*D

**54**, 1119–1131.Google Scholar

Laskowski, R. A., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. (1993).

*Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures.*

*J. Mol. Biol.*

**231**, 1049–1067.Google Scholar

Morris, A. L., MacArthur, M. W., Hutchinson, E. G. & Thornton, J. M. (1992).

*Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates.*

*Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.*

**12**, 345–364.Google Scholar

Parkinson, G., Vojtechovsky, J., Clowney, L., Brünger, A. T. & Berman, H. M. (1996).

*New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures.*

*Acta Cryst.*D

**52**, 57–64.Google Scholar

Priestle, J. P. (1994).

*Stereochemical dictionaries for protein structure refinement and model building.*

*Structure*,

**2**, 911–913.Google Scholar