International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 21.2, p. 511
Section 21.2.3.1.1.2. Global agreement between the model and experimental data
aUnité de Conformation de Macromolécules Biologiques, Université Libre de Bruxelles, avenue F. D. Roosevelt 50, CP160/16, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium, and EMBL–EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, England, bUnité de Conformation de Macromolécules Biologiques, Université Libre de Bruxelles, avenue F. D. Roosevelt 50, CP160/16, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium, and cDepartment of Chemistry, Rutgers University, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087, USA |
To evaluate the global agreement between the atomic model and the experimental data, the program computes three classical quality indicators: the R factor, (Brünger, 1992b) and the correlation coefficient between the calculated and observed structure-factor amplitudes (Table 21.2.3.1). The R factor is computed using all the reflections considered (except those approximated by their average value in the corresponding resolution shell) and applying the same resolution and σ cutoff as those reported by the authors. is computed using the subset of reflections specified by the authors. In addition, the R factor is evaluated using the `non-free' subset of reflections (those not used to compute ). The correlation coefficient is computed using all reflections from the reported high-resolution limit, applying the smooth low-resolution cutoff (see Table 21.2.3.1) but no σ cutoff.
References
Brünger, A. T. (1992b). Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. Nature (London), 355, 472–474.Google Scholar