International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 22.2, pp. 551-552
Section 22.2.7.1. C—H···O hydrogen bonds
aSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92-109, Auckland, New Zealand |
Sutor (1962) first summarized evidence for C—H···O hydrogen bonds following earlier suggestions by Pauling (1960), and current evidence has been nicely summarized in several recent articles (Derewenda et al., 1995; Wahl & Sundaralingam, 1997). The energy of C—H···O hydrogen bonds has been generally estimated as ∼0.5 kcal mol−1 (about 10% of an N—H···O interaction) but may be higher, especially in hydrophobic environments. It also depends on the acidity of the C—H proton, with methylene (CH2) and methyne (CH) groups being most favourable.
A number of examples of C—H···O hydrogen bonds can be found in nucleic acid structures (Wahl & Sundaralingam, 1997). The best known is that between the backbone O5′ oxygen and a purine C(8)—H or pyrimidine C(6)—H, when the bases are in the anti conformation. Another example is given by a U–U base pair, in which the two bases form a conventional N(3)—H···O(4) hydrogen bond and a C(5)—H···O hydrogen bond.
In proteins, two groups are regarded as being particularly significant (Derewenda et al., 1995). These are the CɛH of His side chains and the methylene H atoms of the main-chain α-carbon atoms. C—H···O hydrogen bonds involving His side chains have been found for the active-site His residues of proteins of the lipase/esterase family and in other proteins (Derewenda et al., 1994). The CαH atoms appear to provide much more widespread C—H···O hydrogen bonding, however, especially in β-sheets, where they are directed towards the `free' lone pairs of the main-chain C=O groups. C—H···O hydrogen bonds may thus play a previously unrecognised role in satisfying the hydrogen-bond potential of C=O groups. In general, Derewenda et al. (1995) find a significant number of C···O contacts that meet the criteria for C—H···O hydrogen bonds; the H···O distance peaks at 2.45 Å (C···O 3.5 Å), which is less than the van der Waals distance of 2.7 Å, and the angles indicate that the H atoms are directed at the acceptor lone-pair orbitals.
References
Derewenda, Z. S., Derewenda, U. & Kobos, P. (1994). (His)Cɛ—H···O=C< hydrogen bond in the active site of serine hydrolases. J. Mol. Biol. 241, 83–93.Google ScholarDerewenda, Z. S., Lee, L. & Derewenda, U. (1995). The occurrence of C—H···O hydrogen bonds in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 252, 248–262.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1960). The nature of the chemical bond, 3rd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sutor, D. J. (1962). The C—H···O hydrogen bond in crystals. Nature (London), 195, 68–69.Google Scholar
Wahl, M. C. & Sundaralingam, M. (1997). C—H···O hydrogen bonding in biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 97–102.Google Scholar