International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 23.3, pp. 592-593
Section 23.3.2.4. Helix parameters
a
Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1570, USA |
An important advantage of single-crystal oligonucleotide structures over fibre-based models is that one can actually observe local sequence-based departures from ideal helix geometry. B-DNA fibre models indicated a mean twist of ca 36° per step, or ten base pairs per turn, whereas A-DNA fibre patterns indicated less winding: ca 33° per step or 11 base pairs per turn. Twist, rise per base pair along the helix axis, horizontal displacement of base pairs off that axis, and inclination of base pairs away from perpendicularity to the axis are all intuitively obvious parameters. But when single-crystal structures began appearing in great numbers in the mid-1980s, it became imperative that uniform names and definitions be used for these and for less obvious, but increasingly significant, local helix parameters.
An EMBO workshop on DNA curvature and bending, held at Churchill College, Cambridge, in September 1988, led to an agreement on definitions and conventions that was published simultaneously in four journals (Dickerson et al., 1989). Fig. 23.3.2.10
shows the reference frames for two successive base pairs, and Figs. 23.3.2.11
and 23.3.2.12
illustrate local helix parameters involving rotation and translation, respectively. Subsequent experience has shown the most useful parameters to be inclination, propeller, twist and roll among the rotations, and x displacement, rise and slide among the translations. As mentioned at the beginning of this chapter, inclination and x displacement are the two properties that best differentiate A- from B-DNA. The four most widely used computer programs for calculation of local helix parameters are NEWHELIX by Dickerson (B7, B46), CURVES by Lavery & Sklenar (1988
, 1989
), BABCOCK by Babcock & Olson (Babcock et al., 1993
, 1994
; Babcock & Olson, 1994
) and FREEHELIX (Dickerson, 1998c
). NEWHELIX was the earliest of these, but it performs all calculations relative to a best overall helix axis. This is satisfactory for single-crystal DNA structures, but makes the program unusable for the 180° bending observed in some protein–DNA complexes. CURVES is especially convenient for mapping the axis of a bent or curved helix. FREEHELIX, which evolved from NEWHELIX, calculates all parameters relative to local base-pair geometry, without assuming an overall axis, and permits display of normal vector plots that are especially useful in analysing bending in DNA–protein complexes (Dickerson & Chiu, 1997
).
References







