International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume F
Crystallography of biological macromolecules
Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 6.2, pp. 136-137   | 1 | 2 |

Section 6.2.1.4.2. Image plates

B. P. Schoenborna* and R. Knottb

a Life Sciences Division M888, University of California, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 8745, USA, and bSmall Angle Scattering Facility, Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organisation, Physics Division, PMB 1 Menai NSW 2234, Australia
Correspondence e-mail:  schoenborn@lanl.gov

6.2.1.4.2. Image plates

| top | pdf |

The principles underlying the operation of an image plate (IP) are presented in detail in Chapter 7.2[link] . Briefly, the important difference between an IP for X-ray and neutron detection is the presence of a converter (either Gd2O3 or 6Li). The role of the converter is to capture an incoming neutron and create an event within the IP that mimics the detection of an X-ray photon. For example, neutron capture in Gd produces conversion electrons that exit the Gd2O3 grains, enter neighbouring photostimulated luminescence (PSL) material and create colour centres to form a latent image (Niimura et al., 1994[link]; Takahashi et al., 1996[link]). A neutron IP may have a virtually unlimited area and a shape limited only by the requirement to locate the detection event in a suitable coordinate system. With a neutron-detection efficiency of up to 80% at ~1–2 Å, a dynamic quantum efficiency of ~25–30% can be obtained. The dynamic range is intrinsically 1:105. The spatial resolution is primarily limited by scattering processes of the readout laser beam, and measured line spread functions are typically 150–200 µm. The γ sensitivity is high and may restrict the application to instruments with low ambient γ background.

Neutron IPs are integrating devices well suited to data-acquisition techniques with long accumulation times, such as Laue diffraction (Niimura et al., 1997[link]) and small-angle scattering. On-line readout is a distinct advantage (Cipriani et al., 1997[link]).

References

First citation Cipriani, F., Castagna, J.-C., Caustre, L., Wilkinson, C. & Lehmann, M. S. (1997). Large area neutron and X-ray image-plate detectors for macromolecular biology. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 392, 471–474.Google Scholar
First citation Niimura, N., Karasawa, Y., Tanaka, I., Miyahara, J., Takahashi, K., Saito, H., Koizumi, S. & Hidaka, M. (1994). An imaging plate neutron detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 349, 521–525.Google Scholar
First citation Niimura, N., Minezaki, Y., Nonaka, T., Castagna, J.-C., Cipriani, F., Høghøj, P., Lehmann, M. S. & Wilkinson, C. (1997). Neutron Laue diffractometry with an imaging plate provides an effective data collection regime for neutron protein crystallography. Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 909–914.Google Scholar
First citation Takahashi, K., Tazaki, S., Miyahara, J., Karasawa, Y. & Niimura, N. (1996). Imaging performance of imaging plate neutron detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 377, 119–122.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page