modify your search
Results for DC.creator="C." AND DC.creator="G." AND DC.creator="van" AND DC.creator="Beek" in section 11.5.7 of volume F |
Anomalous dispersion
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.6, pp. 300-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anomalous dispersion 11.5.7.6. Anomalous dispersion The quality of anomalous-dispersion data can be assessed by calculation of the average scatter, expression (11.5.6.6). The ratios and should be larger than unity for significant anomalous data (Fig. 11.5.7.8). Note the much larger ratios for the scatter among measurements of for data ...
Anisotropic mosaicity
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.5, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anisotropic mosaicity 11.5.7.5. Anisotropic mosaicity Refinement of the effective mosaicity can show both the anisotropic nature of the crystal (Fig. 11.5.7.7) as well as the impact of radiation damage. The effective mosaicity is the convolution of the mosaic spread of the crystal, the beam divergence and the wavelength divergence of the ...
Observed versus calculated partiality
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.4, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... broken line represents the ideal relationship . References Rossmann, M. G., Leslie, A. G. W., Abdel-Meguid, S. S. & Tsukihara, T. (1979). Processing ...
Experimental results
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7, pp. 298-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... a) method 1 and method 2, (b) SCALEPACK. Comparison of (c) method 2 versus method 1, and (d) SCALEPACK versus method ... K., Lee, S., Zhang, Y. P., McKinney, B. R., Wengler, G., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (1996). Structural analysis of Sindbis ...
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1)
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.2, pp. 299-300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1) 11.5.7.2. R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1) In order to determine the limits of tolerance that can be permitted when method 1 is used, the R factor was examined as a function of the sum ...
Variation of scale factors versus frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.1, pp. 298-299 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... a) method 1 and method 2, (b) SCALEPACK. Comparison of (c) method 2 versus method 1, and (d) SCALEPACK versus method ... K., Lee, S., Zhang, Y. P., McKinney, B. R., Wengler, G., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (1996). Structural analysis of Sindbis ...
Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.3, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number 11.5.7.3. Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number The behaviour of the R factor versus frame number (Fig. 11.5.7.5) is more monotonic when method 1 is used compared to method 2. In ...
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.6, pp. 300-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anomalous dispersion 11.5.7.6. Anomalous dispersion The quality of anomalous-dispersion data can be assessed by calculation of the average scatter, expression (11.5.6.6). The ratios and should be larger than unity for significant anomalous data (Fig. 11.5.7.8). Note the much larger ratios for the scatter among measurements of for data ...
Anisotropic mosaicity
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.5, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anisotropic mosaicity 11.5.7.5. Anisotropic mosaicity Refinement of the effective mosaicity can show both the anisotropic nature of the crystal (Fig. 11.5.7.7) as well as the impact of radiation damage. The effective mosaicity is the convolution of the mosaic spread of the crystal, the beam divergence and the wavelength divergence of the ...
Observed versus calculated partiality
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.4, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... broken line represents the ideal relationship . References Rossmann, M. G., Leslie, A. G. W., Abdel-Meguid, S. S. & Tsukihara, T. (1979). Processing ...
Experimental results
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7, pp. 298-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... a) method 1 and method 2, (b) SCALEPACK. Comparison of (c) method 2 versus method 1, and (d) SCALEPACK versus method ... K., Lee, S., Zhang, Y. P., McKinney, B. R., Wengler, G., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (1996). Structural analysis of Sindbis ...
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1)
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.2, pp. 299-300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1) 11.5.7.2. R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1) In order to determine the limits of tolerance that can be permitted when method 1 is used, the R factor was examined as a function of the sum ...
Variation of scale factors versus frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.1, pp. 298-299 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... a) method 1 and method 2, (b) SCALEPACK. Comparison of (c) method 2 versus method 1, and (d) SCALEPACK versus method ... K., Lee, S., Zhang, Y. P., McKinney, B. R., Wengler, G., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (1996). Structural analysis of Sindbis ...
Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.3, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number 11.5.7.3. Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number The behaviour of the R factor versus frame number (Fig. 11.5.7.5) is more monotonic when method 1 is used compared to method 2. In ...
powered by |