modify your search
Results for DC.creator="I." AND DC.creator="Usón" in section 16.1.5 of volume F |
Random omit maps
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5.3, p. 419 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
Random omit maps 16.1.5.3. Random omit maps A third peak-picking strategy involves selecting approximately of the top peaks and eliminating some, but, in this case, the deleted peaks are chosen at random. Typically, one-third of the potential atoms are removed, and the remaining atoms are used to compute . ...
Iterative peaklist optimization
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5.2, pp. 418-419 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
Iterative peaklist optimization 16.1.5.2. Iterative peaklist optimization An alternative approach to peak picking is to select approximately peaks as potential atoms and then eliminate some of them, one by one, while maximizing a suitable figure of merit such as The top peaks are used as potential atoms to compute . The ...
Simple peak picking
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5.1, p. 418 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
Simple peak picking 16.1.5.1. Simple peak picking In its simplest form, peak picking consists of simply selecting the top E-map peaks where is the number of unique non-H atoms in the asymmetric unit. This is adequate for true small-molecule structures. It has also been shown to work well ...
Real-space constraints (baking)
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5, pp. 418-419 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
... . Direct-space methods in phase extension and phase determination. I. Low-density elimination. Acta Cryst. A48, 451-456. Smith, G. ...
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5.3, p. 419 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
Random omit maps 16.1.5.3. Random omit maps A third peak-picking strategy involves selecting approximately of the top peaks and eliminating some, but, in this case, the deleted peaks are chosen at random. Typically, one-third of the potential atoms are removed, and the remaining atoms are used to compute . ...
Iterative peaklist optimization
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5.2, pp. 418-419 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
Iterative peaklist optimization 16.1.5.2. Iterative peaklist optimization An alternative approach to peak picking is to select approximately peaks as potential atoms and then eliminate some of them, one by one, while maximizing a suitable figure of merit such as The top peaks are used as potential atoms to compute . The ...
Simple peak picking
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5.1, p. 418 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
Simple peak picking 16.1.5.1. Simple peak picking In its simplest form, peak picking consists of simply selecting the top E-map peaks where is the number of unique non-H atoms in the asymmetric unit. This is adequate for true small-molecule structures. It has also been shown to work well ...
Real-space constraints (baking)
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 16.1.5, pp. 418-419 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000850 ]
... . Direct-space methods in phase extension and phase determination. I. Low-density elimination. Acta Cryst. A48, 451-456. Smith, G. ...
powered by |