modify your search
Results for DC.creator="R." AND DC.creator="Bolotovsky" in section 11.5.7 of volume F |
Anomalous dispersion
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.6, pp. 300-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anomalous dispersion 11.5.7.6. Anomalous dispersion The quality of anomalous-dispersion data can be assessed by calculation of the average scatter, expression (11.5.6.6). The ratios and should be larger than unity for significant anomalous data (Fig. 11.5.7.8). Note the much larger ratios for the scatter among measurements of for data ...
Anisotropic mosaicity
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.5, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anisotropic mosaicity 11.5.7.5. Anisotropic mosaicity Refinement of the effective mosaicity can show both the anisotropic nature of the crystal (Fig. 11.5.7.7) as well as the impact of radiation damage. The effective mosaicity is the convolution of the mosaic spread of the crystal, the beam divergence and the wavelength divergence of the ...
Observed versus calculated partiality
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.4, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Observed versus calculated partiality 11.5.7.4. Observed versus calculated partiality The relationship between observed and calculated partialities (Fig. 11.5.7.6) deviates from the ideal line , especially for the smaller calculated partialities where . This suggests errors in the measurements of or the calculations of . The latter may be improved by a post ...
Experimental results
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7, pp. 298-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... two alternating image plates with slightly different sensitivities in the R-axis camera used in the data collection. Figure 11.5.7.3 | | Linear ... reflects the anisotropy of a thin plate-shaped crystal. 11.5.7.2. R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1 ... that can be permitted when method 1 is used, the R factor was examined as a function of the sum- ...
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1)
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.2, pp. 299-300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1) 11.5.7.2. R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1 ... that can be permitted when method 1 is used, the R factor was examined as a function of the sum- ...
Variation of scale factors versus frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.1, pp. 298-299 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... two alternating image plates with slightly different sensitivities in the R-axis camera used in the data collection. Figure 11.5.7.3 | | Linear ... Choi, H. K., Lee, S., Zhang, Y. P., McKinney, B. R., Wengler, G., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (1996). Structural analysis of Sindbis virus capsid ...
Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.3, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... as a function of frame number The behaviour of the R factor versus frame number (Fig. 11.5.7.5) is more monotonic when ... full reflection intensities independently of the neighbouring frames. Therefore, the R factors per frame calculated after scaling with method 2 truly represent the data quality for individual frames. Figure 11.5.7.5 | | R factor per frame as a function of frame number ...
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.6, pp. 300-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anomalous dispersion 11.5.7.6. Anomalous dispersion The quality of anomalous-dispersion data can be assessed by calculation of the average scatter, expression (11.5.6.6). The ratios and should be larger than unity for significant anomalous data (Fig. 11.5.7.8). Note the much larger ratios for the scatter among measurements of for data ...
Anisotropic mosaicity
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.5, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Anisotropic mosaicity 11.5.7.5. Anisotropic mosaicity Refinement of the effective mosaicity can show both the anisotropic nature of the crystal (Fig. 11.5.7.7) as well as the impact of radiation damage. The effective mosaicity is the convolution of the mosaic spread of the crystal, the beam divergence and the wavelength divergence of the ...
Observed versus calculated partiality
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.4, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
Observed versus calculated partiality 11.5.7.4. Observed versus calculated partiality The relationship between observed and calculated partialities (Fig. 11.5.7.6) deviates from the ideal line , especially for the smaller calculated partialities where . This suggests errors in the measurements of or the calculations of . The latter may be improved by a post ...
Experimental results
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7, pp. 298-301 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... two alternating image plates with slightly different sensitivities in the R-axis camera used in the data collection. Figure 11.5.7.3 | | Linear ... reflects the anisotropy of a thin plate-shaped crystal. 11.5.7.2. R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1 ... that can be permitted when method 1 is used, the R factor was examined as a function of the sum- ...
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1)
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.2, pp. 299-300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1) 11.5.7.2. R factor as a function of `sum-of-partialities' (method 1 ... that can be permitted when method 1 is used, the R factor was examined as a function of the sum- ...
Variation of scale factors versus frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.1, pp. 298-299 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... two alternating image plates with slightly different sensitivities in the R-axis camera used in the data collection. Figure 11.5.7.3 | | Linear ... Choi, H. K., Lee, S., Zhang, Y. P., McKinney, B. R., Wengler, G., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (1996). Structural analysis of Sindbis virus capsid ...
Statistics for rejecting reflections and data quality as a function of frame number
International Tables for Crystallography (2012). Vol. F, Section 11.5.7.3, p. 300 [ doi:10.1107/97809553602060000834 ]
... as a function of frame number The behaviour of the R factor versus frame number (Fig. 11.5.7.5) is more monotonic when ... full reflection intensities independently of the neighbouring frames. Therefore, the R factors per frame calculated after scaling with method 2 truly represent the data quality for individual frames. Figure 11.5.7.5 | | R factor per frame as a function of frame number ...
powered by |