International
Tables for Crystallography Volume A Space-group symmetry Edited by Th. Hahn © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. A. ch. 3.1, pp. 45-46
|
Reflection conditions, diffraction symbols, and possible space groups are listed in Table 3.1.4.1. For each crystal system, a different table is provided. The monoclinic system contains different entries for the settings with b, c and a unique. For monoclinic and orthorhombic crystals, all possible settings and cell choices are treated. In contradistinction to Table 4.3.2.1 , which lists the space-group symbols for different settings and cell choices in a systematic way, the present table is designed with the aim to make space-group determination as easy as possible.
†Pair of space groups with common point group and symmetry elements but differing in the relative location of these elements.
‡Pair of enantiomorphic space groups, cf. Section 3.1.5. §Condition: . ¶For obverse and reverse settings cf. Section 1.2.1 . The obverse setting is standard in these tables. The transformation reverse obverse is given by , , . ††For No. 205, only cyclic permutations are permitted. Conditions are 0kl: ; h0l: ; hk0: . |
The left-hand side of the table contains the Reflection conditions. Conditions of the type or are abbreviated as h or . Conditions like are quoted as h, k; in this case, the condition is not listed as it follows directly from . Conditions with , , or more complicated expressions are listed explicitly.
From left to right, the table contains the integral, zonal and serial conditions. From top to bottom, the entries are ordered such that left columns are kept empty as long as possible. The leftmost column that contains an entry is considered as the `leading column'. In this column, entries are listed according to increasing complexity. This also holds for the subsequent columns within the restrictions imposed by previous columns on the left. The make-up of the table is such that observed reflection conditions should be matched against the table by considering, within each crystal system, the columns from left to right.
The centre column contains the Extinction symbol. To obtain the complete diffraction symbol, the Laue-class symbol has to be added in front of it. Be sure that the correct Laue-class symbol is used if the crystal system contains two Laue classes. Particular care is needed for Laue class in the trigonal system, because there are two possible orientations of this Laue symmetry with respect to the crystal lattice, and . The correct orientation can be obtained directly from the diffraction record.
The right-hand side of the table gives the Possible space groups which obey the reflection conditions. For crystal systems with two Laue classes, a subdivision is made according to the Laue symmetry. The entries in each Laue class are ordered according to their point groups. All space groups that match both the reflection conditions and the Laue symmetry, found in a diffraction experiment, are possible space groups of the crystal.
The space groups are given by their short Hermann–Mauguin symbols, followed by their number between parentheses, except for the monoclinic system, where full symbols are given (cf. Section 2.2.4 ). In the monoclinic and orthorhombic sections of Table 3.1.4.1, which contain entries for the different settings and cell choices, the `standard' space-group symbols (cf. Table 4.3.2.1 ) are printed in bold face. Only these standard representations are treated in full in the space-group tables.
Example
The diffraction pattern of a compound has Laue class mmm. The crystal system is thus orthorhombic. The diffraction spots are indexed such that the reflection conditions are ; ; ; . Table 3.1.4.1 shows that the diffraction symbol is mmmPcn–. Possible space groups are Pcn2 (30) and Pcnm (53). For neither space group does the axial choice correspond to that of the standard setting. For No. 30, the standard symbol is Pnc2, for No. 53 it is Pmna. The transformation from the basis vectors , used in the experiment, to the basis vectors of the standard setting is given by for No. 30 and by for No. 53.
Possible pitfalls
Errors in the space-group determination may occur because of several reasons.
References
Buerger, M. J. (1960). Crystal-structure analysis, Chap. 5. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarCatti, M. & Ferraris, G. (1976). Twinning by merohedry and X-ray crystal structure determination. Acta Cryst. A32, 163–165.Google Scholar
Koch, E. (2004). Twinning. International Tables for Crystallography Vol. C, 3rd ed., edited by E. Prince, ch. 1.3. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lipson, H. & Cochran, W. (1966). The determination of crystal structures, Chaps. 3 and 4.4. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Perez-Mato, J. M. & Iglesias, J. E. (1977). On simple and double diffraction enhancement of symmetry. Acta Cryst. A33, 466–474.Google Scholar