International
Tables for Crystallography Volume B Reciprocal space Edited by U. Shmueli © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. B. ch. 1.3, pp. 93-94
|
The theory of diffraction by helical structures (Cochran et al., 1952; Klug et al., 1958) has played an important part in the study of polypeptides, of nucleic acids and of tobacco mosaic virus.
Let be a reasonably regular function in two-dimensional real space. Going over to polar coordinates and writing, by slight misuse of notation, for we may use the periodicity of f with respect to φ to expand it as a Fourier series (Byerly, 1893): with
Similarly, in reciprocal space, if and if then with where the phase factor has been introduced for convenience in the forthcoming step.
The Fourier transform relation between f and F may then be written in terms of 's and 's. Observing that , and that (Watson, 1944) we obtain: hence, by the uniqueness of the Fourier expansion of F: The inverse Fourier relationship leads to The integral transform involved in the previous two equations is called the Hankel transform (see e.g. Titchmarsh, 1922; Sneddon, 1972) of order n.
Let ρ be the electron-density distribution in a fibre, which is assumed to have translational periodicity with period 1 along z, and to have compact support with respect to the (x, y) coordinates. Thus ρ may be written where is the motif.
By the tensor product property, the inverse Fourier transform may be written and hence consists of `layers' labelled by l: with
Changing to polar coordinates in the (x, y) and planes decomposes the calculation of F from ρ into the following steps: and the calculation of ρ from F into:
These formulae are seen to involve a 2D Fourier series with respect to the two periodic coordinates φ and z, and Hankel transforms along the radial coordinates. The two periodicities in φ and z are independent, so that all combinations of indices (n, l) occur in the Fourier summations.
Helical symmetry involves a `clutching' between the two (hitherto independent) periodicities in φ (period 2π) and z (period 1) which causes a subdivision of the period lattice and hence a decimation (governed by `selection rules') of the Fourier coefficients.
Let i and j be the basis vectors along and z. The integer lattice with basis (i, j) is a period lattice for the dependence of the electron density ρ of an axially periodic fibre considered in Section 1.3.4.5.1.3:
Suppose the fibre now has helical symmetry, with u copies of the same molecule in t turns, where g.c.d. . Using the Euclidean algorithm, write with λ and μ positive integers and . The period lattice for the dependence of ρ may be defined in terms of the new basis vectors:
In terms of the original basis If α and β are coordinates along I and J, respectively, or equivalently By Fourier transformation, with the transformations between indices given by the contragredients of those between coordinates, i.e. and It follows that or alternatively that which are two equivalent expressions of the selection rules describing the decimation of the transform. These rules imply that only certain orders n contribute to a given layer l.
The 2D Fourier analysis may now be performed by analysing a single subunit referred to coordinates α and β to obtain and then reindexing to get only the allowed 's by This is u times faster than analysing u subunits with respect to the coordinates.
References
Byerly, W. E. (1893). An elementary treatise on Fourier's series and spherical, cylindrical and ellipsoidal harmonics. Boston: Ginn & Co. [Reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1959.]Google ScholarCochran, W., Crick, F. H. C. & Vand, V. (1952). The structure of synthetic polypeptides. I. The transform of atoms on a helix. Acta Cryst. 5, 581–586.Google Scholar
Klug, A., Crick, F. H. C. & Wyckoff, H. W. (1958). Diffraction by helical structures. Acta Cryst. 11, 199–213.Google Scholar
Sneddon, I. N. (1972). The use of integral transforms. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Titchmarsh, E. C. (1922). Hankel transforms. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 21, 463–473.Google Scholar
Watson, G. N. (1944). A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar