International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 14.1, p. 297
Section 14.1.10. Location of heavy-atom sites
aInstitute of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA |
During the development of protein crystallography, it was understood that heavy-atom sites might be located from difference Patterson functions, but there was substantial debate as to the type of function that was preferable (Perutz, 1956).
Blow (1958), and also Rossmann (1960), advocated a Patterson function with amplitudes . It relies on the admittedly crude assumption that the desired scattering amplitude of the heavy atoms, , can be approximated by The approximation does have one very helpful characteristic, namely, that it tends to be most accurate when is large, i.e. when is parallel or antiparallel to (cf. Fig. 14.1.4.1). Thus, the numerically largest coefficients in the Patterson function tend to represent correctly. Given a well behaved isomorphous heavy-atom derivative, and accurately measured data, experience has shown that a map with coefficients can give an excellent representation of the desired heavy-atom–heavy-atom vector peaks.
References
Blow, D. M. (1958). The structure of haemoglobin. VII. Determination of phase angles in the non-centrosymmetric [100] zone. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 247, 302–336.Google ScholarPerutz, M. F. (1956). Isomorphous replacement and phase determination in non-centrosymmetric space groups. Acta Cryst. 9, 867–873.Google Scholar
Rossmann, M. G. (1960). The accurate determination of the position and shape of heavy-atom replacement groups in proteins. Acta Cryst. 13, 221–226.Google Scholar