INTERNATIONAL TABLES

for CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

Volume G

Definition and Exchange of Crystallographic Data

3.2. Classification and use of core data

S. R. Hall, P. M. D. Fitzgerald and B. McMahon

Abstract

Each data item in a CIF has a unique identity and properties, and these are described in the DDL dictionary definitions. The name of a data item (its 'tag') is its primary identifier and it serves as the unique access key to a data value. Although each data item is unique, it is often closely related to other data items. These relationships, which are specified in the dictionaries using particular DDL attributes, can require certain items to be grouped into common lists. Specific relationships may express a dependency that require other data items to be present in a CIF when a certain data item is used. Such relationships lead to data being classified into groups, or categories of data.

The data name is chosen to be as descriptive of the data item as possible and contains the category name at the front. For example, data describing atom sites in a structural model have names that start with the string _atom_site and are placed into the category group of the same name.

This chapter describes the rationale for the classification of crystallographic data into the existing categories used in the core dictionary.

References

Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. (1967). Angle calculations for 3- and 4-circle X-ray and neutron diffractometers. Acta Cryst. 22, 457-464.

Hall, S. R. (1981). Space-group notation with an explicit origin. Acta Cryst. A37, 517-525; erratum (1981), A37, 921.

Hall, S. R. & Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W. (2001). International tables for crystallography, Vol. B, Reciprocal space, edited by U. Shmueli, 2nd ed., Appendix A1.4.2.3. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Klyne, W. & Prelog, V. (1960). Description of steric relationships across single bonds. Experientia, 16, 521-523.