International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume C
Mathematical, physical and chemical tables
Edited by E. Prince

International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. C. ch. 3.4, p. 168

Section 3.4.2.4. Precession geometry setting with moving-crystal methods

P. F. Lindleya

a ESRF, Avenue des Martyrs, BP 220, F-38043 Grenoble CEDEX, France

3.4.2.4. Precession geometry setting with moving-crystal methods

| top | pdf |

Methods of setting crystals so that a crystal lattice vector lies along the X-ray beam have been fully described by Buerger (1964[link]). Optical alignment precedes small-angle (typically 2–5°) precession photographs taken with unfiltered radiation. The use of a screen with a central hole may assist the identification of the outer ends of the white-radiation streaks on the zero-layer pattern by preventing the recording of the upper-layer patterns. The deviation of the zero-layer pattern from cylindrical symmetry about the direct beam leads to the measurement of simultaneous corrections for the spindle angle and goniometer-head arcs. These adjustments are particularly easy if the goniometer-head arcs are perpendicular and parallel to the X-ray beam, and both arcs read zero. Reider (1975[link]) has proposed an approximate stereographic method of making appropriate corrections when these ideal conditions are not fulfilled. Where optical alignment is not possible, or recognition of a zero-layer pattern is difficult, reciprocal space can be systematically explored by taking a series of small-angle precession photographs at regular intervals (e.g. 15°) around the spindle axis until a suitable zero-layer pattern is found. In such cases, and particularly for nonorthogonal crystal systems, the use of the complementary rotation technique is recommended (see Subsection 3.4.2.3[link]).

In the final alignment when the crystal lattice vector is parallel to the X-ray beam, it is also desirable to have a reciprocal axis parallel to the spindle axis. With this combined setting, it is possible to survey the whole of reciprocal space (to a θ limit equal to the maximum precession angle mechanically available) with one mounting of the crystal.

References

First citation Buerger, M. J. (1964). The precession method in X-ray crystallography. New York: John Wiley. Google Scholar
First citation Reider, M. (1975). Precession photography: orientating crystals by means of the stereographic projection. J. Appl. Cryst. 8, 388–389.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page