International
Tables for Crystallography Volume F Crystallography of biological macromolecules Edited by M. G. Rossmann and E. Arnold © International Union of Crystallography 2006 |
International Tables for Crystallography (2006). Vol. F. ch. 4.1, p. 81
Section 4.1.2.1. General considerations
a
Unité Propre de Recherche du CNRS, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 15 rue René Descartes, F-67084 Strasbourg CEDEX, France, and bDepartment of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717, USA |
Many methods can be used to crystallize macromolecules (McPherson, 1982, 1998; Ducruix & Giegé, 1999), the objectives of which bring the macromolecules to an appropriate state of supersaturation. Although vapour-phase equilibrium and dialysis techniques are favoured, batch and free interface diffusion methods are often used (Fig. 4.1.2.1). Besides the current physical and chemical parameters that affect crystallization (Table 4.1.2.1), macromolecular crystal growth is affected by the crystallization method itself and the geometry of the arrangements used. Generally, in current methods, growth is promoted by the non-equilibrium nature of the crystallization process, which seldom occurs at constant protein concentration. This introduces changes in supersaturation and hence may lead to changes in growth mechanism. Crystallization at constant protein concentration can, however, be achieved in special arrangements based on liquid circulation cells (Vekilov & Rosenberger, 1998).
|
References
Ducruix, A. & Giegé, R. (1999). Editors. Crystallization of proteins and nucleic acids: a practical approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: IRL Press.Google ScholarMcPherson, A. (1982). The preparation and analysis of protein crystals. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
McPherson, A. (1998). Crystallization of biological macromolecules. Cold Spring Harbor and New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Vekilov, P. G. & Rosenberger, F. (1998). Protein crystal growth under forced solution flow: experimental setup and general response of lysozyme. J. Cryst. Growth, 186, 251–261.Google Scholar