International
Tables for
Crystallography
Volume D
Physical properties of crystals
Edited by A. Authier

International Tables for Crystallography (2013). Vol. D. ch. 1.11, p. 274

Section 1.11.4. Physical mechanisms for the anisotropy of atomic X-ray susceptibility

V. E. Dmitrienko,a* A. Kirfelb and E. N. Ovchinnikovac

a A. V. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography, Leninsky pr. 59, Moscow 119333, Russia,bSteinmann Institut der Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, Bonn, D-53115, Germany, and cFaculty of Physics, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia
Correspondence e-mail:  [email protected]

1.11.4. Physical mechanisms for the anisotropy of atomic X-ray susceptibility

| top | pdf |

Conventional non-resonant Thomson scattering in condensed matter is the result of the interaction of the electric field of the electromagnetic wave with the charged electron subsystem. However, there are also other mechanisms of interaction, e.g. interaction of electromagnetic waves with spin and orbital moments, which was first considered by Platzman & Tzoar (1970link to reference) for molecules and solids. They predicted the sensitivity of X-ray diffraction to a magnetic structure of a crystal, as later observed in the pioneering works of de Bergevin & Brunel (de Bergevin & Brunel, 1972link to reference, 1981link to reference; Brunel & de Bergevin, 1981link to reference). It is reasonable to describe all X-ray–electron interactions by the Pauli equation (Berestetskii et al., 1982link to reference), which is a low-energy approximation to the Dirac equation (typical X-ray energies are Mathematical symbol Mathematical symbol where m is the electron mass). The equation accounts for charge and spin interaction with the electromagnetic field of the wave, and spin–orbit interaction (Blume, 1985link to reference, 1994link to reference) using the following Hamiltonian:Mathematical equationwhere Mathematical symbol is the momentum of the pth electron, and Mathematical symbol is the vector potential of the electromagnetic wave with wavevector Mathematical symbol and polarization Mathematical symbol.

Here and below Mathematical symbol + Mathematical symbol, where Mathematical symbol is a quantization volume, index Mathematical symbol labels two polarizations of each wave, Mathematical symbol are the polarizations vectors, and Mathematical symbol and Mathematical symbol are the photon annihilation and creation operators.

Considering X-ray scattering by different atoms in solids as independent processes [in Section 1.2.4[link] of International Tables for Crystallography Volume B, this is called `the isolated-atom approximation in X-ray diffraction'; the validity of this approximation has been discussed by Kolpakov et al. (1978link to reference)], the atomic scattering amplitude Mathematical symbol, which describes the scattering of a wave with wavevector Mathematical symbol and polarization Mathematical symbol into a wave with wavevector Mathematical symbol and polarization Mathematical symbol, can be written asMathematical equationwhere the tensor atomic factor Mathematical symbol depends not only on the wavevectors but also on the atomic environment, magnetic and orbital moments etc. From equation (1.11.4.1)link to equation and with the help of perturbation theory (Berestetskii et al., 1982link to reference), the atomic factor Mathematical symbol can be expressed asMathematical equationwhere the first line describes the non-resonant Thomson scattering and Mathematical symbol is the energy width of the excited state Mathematical symbol. The second line gives non-resonant magnetic scattering with the spin and orbital terms given by the rank-3 tensors Mathematical symbol (1.11.5.2)link to equation and Mathematical symbol (1.11.5.1)link to equation, respectively. Compared to the second-to-last line, where the energy denominator can be close to zero, the last line is usually neglected, but sometimes it has to be added to the non-resonant terms, in particular at photon energies far from resonance. The third term gives the dispersion corrections also addressed as resonant scattering, magnetic and non-magnetic. In equation (1.11.4.3)link to equation, Mathematical symbol and Mathematical symbol are the ground and excited states energies, respectively; Mathematical symbol is the probability that the incident state of the scatterer Mathematical symbol is occupied; and Mathematical symbol is the scattering vector (in the case of diffraction Mathematical symbol, where Mathematical symbol is the Bragg angle). The vector operator Mathematical symbol has the formMathematical equationThe second term in this equation is small and is frequently omitted.

In general, the total atomic scattering factor looks likeMathematical equationwhere Mathematical symbol is the ordinary Thomson (non-resonant) factor, Mathematical symbol and Mathematical symbol are the isotropic corrections to the dispersion and absorption, which become stronger near absorption edges (Mathematical symbol), and Mathematical symbol and Mathematical symbol are the real and imaginary contributions accounting for resonant anisotropic scattering and are sensitive to the local symmetry of the resonant atom and its magnetism. In the latter case, one should add the tensor Mathematical symbol (Mathematical symbolMathematical symbol) describing magnetic non-resonant scattering, which is also anisotropic (see the next section).

References

First citation Berestetskii, V. B., Lifshitz, E. M. & Pitaevskii, L. P. (1982). Quantum Electrodynamics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
First citation Bergevin, F. de & Brunel, M. (1972). Observation of magnetic superlattice peaks by X-ray diffraction on an antiferromagnetic NiO crystal. Phys. Lett. A, 39, 141–142.Google Scholar
First citation Bergevin, F. de & Brunel, M. (1981). Diffraction of X-rays by magnetic materials. I. General formulae and measurements on ferro- and ferrimagnetic compounds. Acta Cryst. A37, 314–324.Google Scholar
First citation Blume, M. (1985). Magnetic scattering of X-rays. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 3615–3618.Google Scholar
First citation Blume, M. (1994). Resonant X-ray diffraction and polarization analysis at the iron K-edge. In Resonant Anomalous X-ray Scattering. Theory and Applications, edited by G. Materlik, C. J. Sparks & K. Fischer, pp. 91–97. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
First citation Brunel, M. & de Bergevin, F. (1981). Diffraction of X-rays by magnetic materials. II. Measurements on antiferromagnetic Fe2O3. Acta Cryst. A37, 324–331.Google Scholar
First citation Kolpakov, A. V., Bushuev, V. A. & Kuz'min, R. N. (1978). Dielectric permittivity in the X-ray region. Sov. Phys. Usp. 21, 959–977.Google Scholar
First citation Platzman, P. M. & Tzoar, N. (1970). Magnetic scattering of X-rays from electrons in molecules and solids. Phys. Rev. B, 2, 3556–3559.Google Scholar








































to end of page
to top of page